On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, MHR <mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Rather than guessing, why not look at the output from the rpm >>> command >>> he ran, which gives the name of the package he's missing? Filipe >>> nailed this one a little earlier in the thread with unifdef.x86_64 >>> needing to be installed. >> >> I remember running into this a while back. That being the case, >> shouldn't unifdef be included in kernel-devel, or at least one of the >> packages that are required for building a kernel? Seems like it >> sticks out like a sore thumb this way.... >> >> Alternatively, how do I go about suggesting this in a formal way >> (bugzilla, etc.)? > > Alan and I are now talking about this so we can amend the Wiki article > appropriately. According to him, unifdef is not required on his > 32-bit system. I will update on this subject as soon as I gather more > info. I've needed it on RHEL 5 systems before I could build the kernel source on 32 bit systems. I probably did with CentOS too, but I don't recall for sure.