> However, another post implies a possible oversight on my part. He > mentions entry # 5 in an announcement. Being an (a?)typical "hoomon", I > could've scrolled by too quickly and missed them. <*sigh*>. The ultimate > CPE problem. > > Thinking about it, I tend too watch for the point releases in there own > announcements. Bad habit I guess. > >> Cheers, >> >> Ralph I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my filters. I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches. Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle out to the individual arches. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080916/5b2ff18f/attachment-0004.sig>