On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:53 AM, David Andrews <dandrews at visi.com> wrote: > At 11:01 PM 8/31/2008, you wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote: >> >> also NOT top posting? - Wht do u mean by this I don't get u. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:54 AM, MHR <mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera >>> <slinuxworld at gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > thx every much trying to get me on to the right track and I >>> apologize for >>> > being such an ass. Sorry again yes I made a big mistake. I was >>> under lot of >>> > pressure in my private life so I think that might have come over me. >>> >>> Well, now that the pressure's off, or lightened, how about editing >>> your posts, and also NOT top posting? >>> >> >> >> he means what you did just here, and in your other posts. :) you put >> your response above the quoted message you were replying to, rather >> than below it. please don't do this; it makes it difficult to follow >> the conversation, and thus it decreases the likelihood that you will >> get the responses you want. >> >> also, when i just now did a google search for "top posting", the >> entire first page of hits were all links that explained what he was >> talking about. >> >> -steve >> > > While I know that the practice won't, and shouldn't change for me, I would > just like to say that for some of us, top posting is more useful. I am a > blind computer user, and top posting is easier to handle. I can read the > response, and continue reading if I need context, more information etc. > > Unix/Linux people tend to be pretty black and white, and the world should > be a certain way ... but remember, others of us may have a good reason for > wanting a different world! > > Dave > > Sorry, Guys I was not doing it intentionally I'm using Gmail so the thing > is when ever I click on reply it goes to top so as a habit I do top posting. > So sorry for any difficulties. > Regards Sadaruwan Samaraweera -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080901/0fb07b79/attachment-0005.html>