[CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
Robert Moskowitz
rgm at htt-consult.comThu Apr 2 14:11:39 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
- Next message: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
rray_1 at comcast.net wrote: > What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 > It is EOLed. That is all fixes to 5.2 are 5.3. So there is little choice unless you take on the whole management issue. BTW, I had some systems that would simply NOT do an install with the 5.2 boot CD. I HAD to install with 5.1 then upgrade them to 5.2. So I only recently finally pulled my local 5.1 repo.
- Previous message: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
- Next message: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list