Michael A. Peters wrote: > Well, technically the source has to be made available from CentOS to > anyone they distribute the software to. > > However, I don't believe it needs to be made available by http, CentOS > would probably be in GPL compliance if they distributed it on IBM punch > cards to those who requested it. No. We have to distribute it the same way we distribute the binaries, so David is correct. And yes, this was a release with many hiccups, he's correct there, too. And I can understand him, I probably would feel the same. But as it stands we're going to release the SRPMS a bit later than the binaries, and we will try to make the next release smoother. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090401/099cada9/attachment-0005.sig>