-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror From: Blake Hudson <blake at ispn.net> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Date: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:00:53 PM > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror > From: John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Date: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 4:46:21 PM >>> Interesting.....I thought that i686 used instructions only available >>> on later processors, i.e. i486 and pentium III do not have the later >>> instruction set to accept compiled code for i686..... >>> I'm no expert, but that is why there are i386, i686 and x86_64 type >>> packages to cater for various processor types. >>> >> >> pentium-III is a i686, as is pretty much everything since Pentium Pro >> >> >> i386 - 386 >> i486 - 486 >> i586 - pentium, pentium w/ mmx >> i686 - pentium pro, p-II, p-III, p4, core/core2/etc. >> >> >> > I simply mentioned the CPU type because it had been done previously by > the op. I'm confident the issue has nothing to do with the CPU or > kernel type. The issue appears to be with some (or all) of the mirrors > under certain configurations. I was hoping someone with more > yum/mirror/repo experience would be able to spot the problem if I > squeaked - I'm sure it's something I can work around, but I wouldn't > want it to impact others. > > --Blake Google indicates "Requested Range Not Satisfiable" is actually an HTTP error (not specific to yum). The description of the error indicates that my browser (yum) requested a segment of the file that does not exist... e.g, bytes 10-1000 of a 100 byte file. I'm thinking that this file is possibly corrupt or the mirrors think the file is larger than it actually is? just a guess... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090407/77c48a9a/attachment-0005.html>