Farkas Levente wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 04/13/2009 04:43 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >>>> Well, I heard from one of the CentOS devs that mock newer than 0.6 was >>>> broken. >>> OK, fair 'nuf. Just seemed silly to me that you'd assume epel would release >>> something that was broken. >> EPEL releases broken stuff all the time :) >> >> Also mock > 0.6 doesnt work properly on c3/c4 - and mock 0.9.x is >> different enough to produce inconsistent builds with mock 0.6, which is >> why were sticking to mock 0.6 for the time being, within CentOS. > > on centos-5.2 mock-0.9.x was working properly. now neither mock not even > rpmbuild working for us (this second is another probably rpm bug which > is just investigating). > anyway you suggest to use mock 0.6 on 5.3? > thanks. it turns out as we downgrade to 5.2's rpm*, popt packages both our rpmbuild problem and mock-0.9.x problems goes away. so it seems there is/are some kind of rpm bug in 5.3. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"