Well, I know I have benefited from the discussion because I understand the challenges that face the CentOS team with regards to security updates whilst they are rebuilding a point release. As has been pointed out to me, we're between a rock and a hard-place and it isn't just a simple matter of not enough resourcing - which is what I thought the issue was... now I stand corrected. Obviously, the security concern is not unreasonable because the CentOS team are considering a different approach for 5.4. What I also now know is this is inherent in any rebuild, so I know have to consider whether a rebuild is the best approach for me. So, for those of you who consider this as "in-fighting", know that some considers it "learning". ________________________________ From: William L. Maltby <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Sunday, 9 August, 2009 20:44:00 Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 14:04 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote: > <snip> > As for getting more people to use CentOS, I don't think squabbling on > a public mail list is exactly the best way to do that. OTOH, one man's "squabbling" is another's "open discourse", depending on attitudes, "presentation", etc. That's one reason I tend to not freely speak my mind, even with all due respect. Just too many "issues" can arise and none of it is worth the potential aggravation unless I feel I might have something to contribute that might actually provide some benefit - even stimulating a positive thought in another. As one could surmise, that kind of filter saves a lot of time. -- Bill _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090809/b240e66d/attachment-0004.html>