[CentOS] NIS failover

John R. Dennison jrd at gerdesas.com
Thu Dec 17 19:50:16 UTC 2009

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:44:54PM -0700, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Not one you want to hear: ditch NIS. It's known to have a *lot* of
> security holes. At the very least, NIS+. Better would be either RH

	Out of curiousity, can you point me to writeups of known working
	exploits against current yp-family versions on CentOS?

	NIS+ is not, the last time I checked, available for Linux; if
	my understanding is in error I would very much welcome


We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once.

-- Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933), 30th president of the United States
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091217/550fcaec/attachment.sig>

More information about the CentOS mailing list