[CentOS] [OT] Urgent request

John R. Dennison jrd at gerdesas.com
Thu Dec 17 22:21:12 UTC 2009

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:22:58PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> how do you know this is the problem, and the motherboard hasn't croaked 
> in some OTHER 10+ year old crusty mobo fashion ?

	Because the original poster specifically stated that the 
	box had failed video ram in it? :)  While possible that there
	are other issues at play, I can only go by the information
	provided by the orignal poster.

	I've never seen a motherboard from that era that could bypass
	failed video memory POST results - YMMV.


"Thinking implies disagreement; and disagreement implies non-comformity; and
non-comformity implies heresy; and heresy implies disloyality -- so obviously
thinking must be stopped"
[Call to Greatness, 1954] -- Adlai Stephenson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091217/eaf14718/attachment.sig>

More information about the CentOS mailing list