[CentOS] two questions about ssh tunneling
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Dec 4 23:49:50 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] two questions about ssh tunneling
- Next message: [CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tudod Ki wrote: > if I: > > ssh -fND localhost:6000 somebody at 192.168.56.5 -p PORTNUMBER > > from computer "A" to computer "B" [B = 192.168.56.5] then I can set the > SOCKS proxy for e.g.: Firefox to use "localhost:6000" on computer "A". > Ok. I can surf the web through "B". > > But: > - Can anyone sniff the traffic of "A"? [e.g.: computers on same subnet > as "A"] Like DNS requests? - I think no, but I'm not sure :O The packets between A and B will be be visible only as encrypted ssh packets. DNS lookups will depend on the client socks protocol. Socks4 did the lookups on the client and was extended as socks4a to do dns on the server. Socks5 lets the server handle dns. > - Can anyone sniff the traffic of computer "B"? e.g.: B computer is at a > server farm [others in the farm can see the traffic?] - I think yes, but > I'm not sure :O The A-B connection will appear here as well, as encrypted ssh packets. The proxied outbound connections will be unencrypted but will appear to originate from B. If you are the only one connected it wouldn't be too hard to deduce what is going on - and the packets will mostly correspond one for one timing wise. So, the connection wouldn't be obvious, but I wouldn't count on not getting caught if you are doing something illegal. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] two questions about ssh tunneling
- Next message: [CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list