[CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comSat Dec 5 18:48:56 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Next message: [CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Timo Schoeler wrote: > For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though. > I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in RHEL anyways, and B) I've heard far too many stories about catastrophic loss problems and day long FSCK sessions after power failures [1] or what have you is B) no longer an issue? I wanna know how come JFS/JFS2 (originally from IBM) isn't more popular in the linux world? At least as implemented in AIX, its rock stable, journaling, excellent performance, and handles both huge files and lots of tiny files without blinking. jfs2 handles really huge file systems, too. I really like how, in AIX, the VM and FS tools are coordinated, so expanding and reorganizing file systems is trivial, nearly as simple as Sun's ZFS. [1] replace power failure with unexpected ups event if you prefer.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Next message: [CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list