[CentOS] scp copy remote files does NOT copy link?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Dec 21 19:39:51 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] scp copy remote files does NOT copy link?
- Next message: [CentOS] scp copy remote files does NOT copy link?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tom H wrote: >>>> Does there has way scp not change "link" setup? > >>> I've always preferred 'rsync -essh -aHv source host:path' over scp for >>> remote copies. It will generally get everything right and in the case >>> where part of the content is already there it is much more efficient. > >> I know I'm going to be embarrassed by the answer to this one but I've >> checked a couple rsync and ssh references, including man rsync, and do >> not find an option -H. What is it? > > -H, --hard-links preserve hard links Most of the other options to create as exact a duplicate as possible are bundled into the '-a' option. However, since there is no efficient way to handle hardlink matching and recreation (it needs a brute-force inode table lookup), it is left separate. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] scp copy remote files does NOT copy link?
- Next message: [CentOS] scp copy remote files does NOT copy link?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list