[CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comWed Dec 23 03:14:06 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance
- Next message: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ross Walker wrote: > Also, for random IO the opposite is true, the rotational latency is > significantly smaller on the inner tracks than the outer tracks, so > random OPs perform better there. > um, most all hard disks are CAV, so the rotational latency measured in milliseconds is constant throughout the disk. usually 50% of a turn is the assumed mean rotational latency
- Previous message: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance
- Next message: [CentOS] partitioning order and IO performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list