[CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comThu Dec 31 21:33:17 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel
- Next message: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Les Mikesell wrote: > Given that it could have been trivial to include Sun Java ages ago, or at least > not intentionally break the jpackage installation methods, I think Red Hat has > done more damage to java than any other company and don't see that turning > around even if they try at this late date. > no, it wasn't trivial due to primarily licensing reasons.
- Previous message: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel
- Next message: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list