On 16/12/09 23:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:52:05 Jake Shipton wrote: > >> On 16/12/09 19:53, Scot P. Floess wrote: >> >>> I have one box on my home network that is x86_64 capable... >>> >> Personally, if you had asked this 3 years ago, I'd have said "Go i686" >> due to compatibility. >> But now-a-days with up-to-date distributions there isn't many packages >> that aren't for x86_64. >> Heck even flash finally got a x86_64 Linux version now :-D (Took them >> long enough though!) >> >> Any machine I have that can run in x86_64, I normally install a x86_64 >> OS, and recently, >> I haven't found anything I need that is only i686. >> > Skype? > > Best, :-) > Marko > > > > I knew someone would find something that isn't 64-bit, in fact, I was waiting for it. :-p But, after a quick Google search, it's possible to run Skype on x86_64. ;) just install the i686 libs, job done (apparently) :-) Same way as any OpenSim/Secondlife viewer is installed :-) Not the most ideal way to run programs on 64, but it works :-) Though I personally don't "need" or "use" Skype ;-) *waits for someone else to go list a bunch of anti-64 packages* PS: Seemingly, Your "Reply-To" makes my email client want to reply to you only (Which I put back to CentOS instead) may cause others to also. Just letting you know :-) -- Jake