On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote: > Mhr wrote on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:50:27 -0800: > > Yes, using ZA is a bad idea. XP has its own firewall which is enabled by > default if you are patched up-to-date. Keep that on. > Now you've sparked my curiosity - how is the XP firewall any better than ZA? Also, in regard to other answers I've seen on the list, since I'm using NAT, isn't another firewall just a waste? Thanks. mhr