[CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll
Rainer Duffner
rainer at ultra-secure.deMon Feb 9 16:11:25 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll
- Next message: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ray Van Dolson schrieb: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:58:38AM -0800, centos at 911networks.com wrote: > The problem is that it is not very modular. You must decided on which features (=patches) you want to incorporate and then build the RPM accordingly. We use tinydns+dnscache almost exclusively (it's not good if you need to play 2ndary for a true BIND) and are very happy with it. Rainer
- Previous message: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll
- Next message: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list