[CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache
Jure Pečar
pegasus at nerv.eu.orgWed Feb 11 19:55:52 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache
- Next message: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:50:34 -0800 Florin Andrei <florin at andrei.myip.org> wrote: > I was just curious about performance comparisons between different types > of load balancers in general. It's hard to say ... you usualy use load balancers to achieve higher availability and put as little as possible in the way of traffic when you want performance (save for the most expensive hw load balancers). For Apache, I had great success with mod_backhand, available at www.backhand.org iirc. It's one of the smartest balancers, but only available for apache 1.3. I've heard 1.3 is still faster than 2.x in many cases. But I'm nginx only now for a few years now ;) -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org
- Previous message: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache
- Next message: [CentOS] clustering and load balancing Apache
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list