On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:58:38AM -0800, centos at 911networks.com wrote: > On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:22:42 -0500 > Jake <jakepaulus at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really > > >had > > any community drive behind it in a while. The latest RPMs on > > rpmforge are for red hat 6 and red hat 7. I very much dislike the > > idea of compiling my own because of all the overhead associated > > with making sure the system stays up-to-date and so on so this > > really puts me off already. Does anyone have an opinion on this > > 1. DJBDNS does not need to be maintained: IT'S PERFECT. Bugless, no > security hole... and does NOT support IPv6. > 2. It's great, works like a rock. > 3. Everything you need to know, including winning the loto, is at: > http://www.lifewithdjbdns.com/ > with all the explanations and the installation is toward the end of > the page. Wasn't it released to public domain along with qmail? Surprised someone hasn't packaged this up for Fedora/EPEL yet if so. Maybe there was some hesitancy based on questions around its public domain status? I'm more familiar with BIND, but used djbdns at a previous job and it worked very well. Ray