On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:00 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >>> William L. Maltby wrote: >>>> You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a >>>> problem, by posting to that list rather than here. >>>> >>> >>> you mean the list you can't find since the rpmforge website is >>> apparently down? >> >> See my other reply. > > I see that _your_ post to rpmforge's list got through ok and the web > site was apparently not fixed at that time, based on Dag's subsequent > post. > > Now, since this is a CentOS list and the mailing lists for rpmforge were > apparently working, what is wrong with suggesting that the user post > there? > > You and Brian both seem to have the same problem with my short reply to > the OP. What specifically is your beef with my suggestion, which was not > critical, combative or offensive in any way that I can see. > >> <snip> > > I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus Thanks for the help