On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Sven Kaptein | MARS websolutions wrote: > > Undoubtedly someone else with more experience with GFS will give you an > > answer, but to me this makes me think ip_conntrack stuff gets cleared > > out and sessions have to reestablish themselves. > > > > Ray > > Ray, > > Thanks for your fast answer and getting me into the right direction. This > sounds like a possible solution, but I have no clue how to fix it. I > googled already a lot on ip_conntrack + gfs, but don't see a possible > solution coming up. > > Can someone/you please help me a little bit more with the issue? You could allow traffic more broadly between your GFS-servers. Pro: packets will not depend on conntrack for delivery. Con: large hole in your firewall that you may not be able to live with. /Peter > Thanks a lot! > Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090217/a6096cec/attachment-0005.sig>