On Wednesday 18 February 2009 23:36:33 Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 20:25:44 Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Anne Wilson > >> <cannewilson at googlemail.com> > > > > wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 18:50:03 Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> >> On 2/18/09, Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:44, Phil Schaffner wrote: > >> >> >> Anne Wilson wrote: > >> >> >> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:25:07 Steve Huff wrote: > > <snip> > > >> >> Anne: Glad you eliminated that problem! I'm curious as to why you are > >> >> using the Konqueror web browser. The version that <snip> > >> > > >> > I was trying to use Konqueror as a file manager :-) The root > >> > konqueror (and other users' konqueror) were all fine, but my ~/.kde > >> > got nuked during extreme > >> > >> <snip> > >> Thank you for the explanation. If you use KDE (I rarely do, but we use > >> some KDE Applications), I think that's the plan. To use Konqueror as > >> your File Manager. Sounds like the Navigation is tough. > > > > When it's working properly it's a breeze, but everything that makes file > > management possible is what I'd lost :-( I'm a happy bunny now, though. > > It's all working again, and (fingers crossed and hope fate isn't > > listening) I think that gpg and konqueror were the last problems to iron > > out. They were also among the most important, though, after IMAP. > > Glad you have things up and running again. Since you use KDE, and to > get closer to the topic of this thread, do you use KGpg? I've tried it > a few times. Yes, I've used it for years. It integrates nicely with kde-pim, and gives a gui interface that is great for quick checks on status, etc.. I still use CLI, though, for serious maintenance. Kgpg would probably do it well enough, but I just get paranoid over some things :-) and take comfort in CLI output (or lack of it, in some cases). Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090219/7b4454aa/attachment-0005.sig>