On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 Ward.P.Fontenot at wellsfargo.com wrote: > I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get > > Trying 192.168.0.1... > telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused > > I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection. I assume that you are not telnetting from Box A .. as that will most likely not work. Are there any additional firewall rules on Box A? Barry > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Barry Brimer > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question > > > > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 Ward.P.Fontenot at wellsfargo.com wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: >> >> BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] >> >> BOX B [1 ip] >> >> I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on > BOX >> A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can >> anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type >> arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my >> situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge >> with iptables) > > iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT > --to 192.168.0.2