On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 12:31 +0000, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 26 February 2009 11:34, William L. Maltby wrote: > ><snip> > > As to the OP original question, check BIOS settings and make sure your > > serial is enabled. Set it to COM 3 and IRQ 4 should work. This would > > equate to "0" in an *IX system. > > > Yes, it says > > COM Port 1 3F8/IRQ4 > > It's a long time since I did anything with com ports, and I wasn't expert, > then, but that looks right. It is. > > > Look in your /var/log/messages file. At boot, you should see the device > > recognized. > > > Feb 26 12:12:25 borg2 kernel: serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a > 16550A > Feb 26 12:12:25 borg2 kernel: serial8250: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a > 16550A Didn't you say there was only one port? There might be a second on the main board that is accessible via a header. If it's not hooked up disable all but the first in the BIOS (later). It's not really hurting anything as is, but it will free the I/O address and IRQ for assignment to other devices. But wait until you have things working - I suspect you have _two_ ports (probably 1 9 pin and 1 25 pin). A second port of 25 pins might easily be mistaken for a printer port. Long ago a switch from Centronics style to RS-232 style began to become the "standard". Physically, it looks the same as a serial port, the visual difference being the "gender" of the connector will be opposite. > Feb 26 12:12:25 borg2 kernel: 00:05: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A > > Is this what I'm looking for? I don't see anything else. Yes. That means that all is as expected (i.e. as _I_ expect). > > > Also, Minicom is _easy_ to use and understand. Give it a try. Even the > > man pages are not difficult. > > > Easy when you know how, eh? :-) I did try it. I changed it to > monitor /dev/ttyS0. Apart from that, I hadn't a clue what to do. I did look > at the man page, too, but not knowing what I was looking for didn't help. I haven't used it for a _long_ time, but IIRC there is an interactive menu system that works with some keystroke, maybe <ESC> key. Look for that stuff in the man pages and it should be clear sailing. First, have you set the baud rate correctly? A lot of things used to default to 9600, but 38400 became common later on. Do the docs for the unit specify? If so, use the stty command, or in minicom or other terminal emulator it's method, to set the baud rate to that needed. Usually these days, no parity check is done so 8 bit characters should be OK. Now, since the port is recognized the failure has to be from the port onward. If the RS-232 9 or 25 pin shell is connected via a cable to the main board, make sure that the cable connector is connected to the right header on the main board. Since Linux reported two ports, there should be two headers on the main board (_if_ that's the method - some ma inboards have them mounted directly on the main board). If the header/connector is not keyed, it may be connected backwards. If you have two RS-232D shells (9 or 25 pin) you may be connecting your cable to the wrong one. Moving on, have you been able to verify the cable is good? If you have an RS-232 patch device with LED's, you can see activity (DTR, DCD, etc.) by hooking the cable to it. If you don't have one of those, a digital multi-meter can be used to see if you have expected voltages on certain pins (+/- 12 volts, IIRC). If you don't have one of those, a plain old dumb terminal can be hooked up and settings changed in a trial and error method. Since they supplied the cable, is it new enough to assume that it is not damaged? If so, I suspect something easy like baud rate. > > Anne > <snip sig stuff> HTH -- Bill