On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 04:55:16PM +0000, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 26 February 2009 13:37, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > Look in your /var/log/messages file. At boot, you should see the device > > > > recognized. > > > > > > Feb 26 12:12:25 borg2 kernel: serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is > > > a 16550A > > > Feb 26 12:12:25 borg2 kernel: serial8250: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is > > > a 16550A > > > > Didn't you say there was only one port? There might be a second on the > > main board that is accessible via a header. If it's not hooked up > > disable all but the first in the BIOS (later). It's not really hurting > > anything as is, but it will free the I/O address and IRQ for assignment > > to other devices. > > I believe you are right. I remember those - and the 25-9-pin adapter :-). > Peering around the back in a dark corner, I could well have been mistaken. > OK - female socket, so that's a COM port, I think. Let me just throw out one caveat here: Many UPSes that use a serial port don't really utilize it to transfer serial data, but rather just raise/lower some of the signal lines to let the software on the host know something has changed. Of course, lots of them, especially newer/smarter ones DO pass serial data. But if this one is one of the dumb ones, the cable may not even be a normal rs-232 cable, so trying to monitor it with a terminal may not produce much useful information. > > Anne > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:3 (niv) ----------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090226/100ec10d/attachment-0005.sig>