[CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

Scott Silva ssilva at sgvwater.com
Wed Jan 7 19:48:03 UTC 2009

on 1-7-2009 10:00 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
> Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 +0000 (GMT):
>> Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions
>> unless one could be an update/bugfix?
> So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is a 
> problem on his setup with it?
> Kai
Yes, but yum needs a little coercion to ignore that update.
You would have to exclude that package after you got the older one installed
so it didn't update.

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090107/f6f276fd/attachment.bin 

More information about the CentOS mailing list