[CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY
rkampen at kampensonline.com
Thu Jan 29 21:29:36 UTC 2009
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: centos-bounces at centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Brett Serkez
>> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:55
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tim Nelson
>> <tnelson at rockbochs.com> wrote:
>>> It is widely known that Quickbooks has a horrible storage
>> engine, "requires" Windows to host multiuser access, etc.
>> However, I've successfully been storing QuickBooks files on
>> Samba shares at a handful of locations with no real issues
>> other than slight performance degradation. However, a
>> somewhat recent thread here mentioned the proper use of
>> oplock'ing in the Samba configuration to considerably
>> increase performance/reliability.
>> I am able to host all files other than Quickbooks on Samba shares.
>> The issue with QuickBooks is they run their own WIndows
>> service on port 10172 in addition to Windows file sharing.
> We run QB Pro 2003, and it does not listen on any ports. We also have it on a
> samba share. Unsure about the perfomance, but it works for us.
>> If someone has figured out a way around this, I would prefer
>> to host multiple user QuickBooks access on Samba.
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
> - -
> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -
> - -
> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
We had QB premier 2004 working well on Samba, then down graded to QB pro
2007 and the nightmare began.
Long story - short version is we now run QB Pro 2007 on a CentOS 5 W/S
running VirtualBox and a W2K instance with network bridging in
multi-user mode so the four Windoze XP clients can access it.
Performance is not great but adequate, however I can backup reliably and
it stays up 24x7.
Wish there was an alternative.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 121 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090129/d1361bc0/attachment.vcf
More information about the CentOS