on 1-7-2009 10:00 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: > Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 +0000 (GMT): > >> Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions >> unless one could be an update/bugfix? > > So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is a > problem on his setup with it? > > Kai > Yes, but yum needs a little coercion to ignore that update. You would have to exclude that package after you got the older one installed so it didn't update. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090107/f6f276fd/attachment-0005.sig>