On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Warren, Eucke <EWarren at wms.com> wrote: <snip> > I appreciate the response. If you recall I did post the link so it's a > safe assumption that I read the page and understood it's content. What > I'm after is whether there's any other information channel that might > not be so obvious for seeing if there might be action coming up for an > particular issue. Being in a highly regulated industry the legal > department has a tough job. I work within the guidelines they set. > >> If Karanbir thinks it merits an upstream bug report, I'm almost sure > he might do that, if the original bug >> poster doesn't. It "might" be fixed by the time >> 5.3 comes out, but do you want to wait? > > I am restricted to 5.1 as approved by legal. 5.2 is not approved so 5.3 > isn't an option either. Does that mean that your Legal Department does not permit you to upgrade your box, to get the latest packages, issued for Security & Stability reasons? 5.1, as you are well aware, is not the latest and greatest.