If you want a official fix then get your self a redhat license, nothing wrong with the excellent help that one can get from this list but by supporting redhat you also in my eyes support centos. The only thing that I have noticed with RH support is that they are actually slower to release a fix or to come up with a fix then Centos, we have quite a few centos servers where I work and this was the reason for why we lowered our licenses to redhat and migrated some servers to Centos. Per On 1/9/09 10:04 AM, "Vandaman" <vandaman2002-sk at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Warren, Eucke wrote: > >> I do see the manual fix for it and will be testing that >> shortly. I am, >> however, dealing with a fairly rigid internal legal >> department that may >> not welcome a "fix" that's not >> "official". So I have two questions: >> >> 1) Is there an "official" or "accepted" >> way to inquire about the status >> of an open bug? >> 2) With regard to bug 0002329 is this something that has to >> be fixed >> upstream so it filters down to centos? >> > > What company is this that doesn't wan't to pay for a support > contract for RHEL but insists on using CentOS but requires > "official fixes" only? > > 1. Can you name and shame this comapany it will make good reading > on teh web. > 2. Consider paying for RHEL so that you can actually get > "official support" and can raise support tickets. > 3. You probably don't understand what CentOS is or who is supposed > to use it. > > > Regards, > Vandaman. > ------------------------------------------------------- > Report another spam? > Your average reporting time is: 3 hours; Great! > ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- > noob detector -> 15 noobs top-posting. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos