[CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
beranger5ca at yahoo.caWed Jul 1 15:29:38 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
- Next message: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> >> The audacious package is willing to wait that long > :) > > > > Nope, because I've built it *for myself*, > > i.e. in my repo. > > And was your patch rejected from the places you are > complaining about? There. Is. No. Question. About. Any. Patch. When you build audacious from SPEC + tarball, it spits out audacious + audacious_plugins, both as RPMs and as SRPMs (actually, it spits around 15 plugins RPMs). RPMforge misses the plugins, that's all. Probably just triggering a rebuild would fix it all. Instead of talking for ages about patches, what builds and what doesn't, and why "better services" would need pay etc. maybe someone (Dag?) could have triggered the rebuild of audacious for 100 times in the meantime. Truly yours, R-C __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
- Previous message: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
- Next message: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list