[CentOS] Lowest latency remote file system
Ray Van Dolson
rayvd at bludgeon.orgWed Jul 22 21:19:14 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Lowest latency remote file system
- Next message: [CentOS] Lowest latency remote file system
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:11:31AM +0300, James Matthews wrote: > I am looking to mount it and as a webserver/database server. So you are > recommending NFS? > > James If you need shared access to the data, NFS is probably the simplest way to go. Depending on how busy things are, you might be fine with standard gig links as well. If you don't need shared access, iSCSI/ATAoE, etc become an option (you could use them with a clustered filesystem also if you needed shared access, but this adds a layer of complexity). Maybe you can define your use case a bit more. Ray
- Previous message: [CentOS] Lowest latency remote file system
- Next message: [CentOS] Lowest latency remote file system
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list