Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: > >>> Anyway, as I said previously, I would rather see the CentOS >>> Project concentrate on the core product and do a really good >>> job on that (i.e, a move closer to the old 4 week release lag >>> than the current 10 week release lag), and I would much rather >>> see this than effort diluted by taking on a contrib repo. >> >> Right: >> http://beranger.org/v3/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/useless_chart_rhel5_clones.png >> >> >> After all, I love (some) charts from time to time. > > I'd be very interested to have a similar chart of the average delay for > updates plotted in time. Not because I think it shows something > fantastic, but rather to give us a better target to meet. > Same here. Maybe something along the lines of the 'days at risk' reports Mark Cox produces for RHEL: http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/ http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/2009012017.html
