[CentOS] hardware requirements for Centos 2

Mon Jul 6 19:23:19 UTC 2009
Lucian@lastdot.org <lucian at lastdot.org>

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:01 PM, <jacob at aers.ca> wrote:
> The RAM is a little on the low side, 512M is the recommended to run a
> GUI at the moment I think but 128M is all that's required for Command
> line, and GUI would probably run but might be a little slow to respond.
> But otherwise this machine should do run Centos 5 fine. The CPU and HD
> are more then adequate
>
> Ubuntu is the anther distro to play with if you want to play with a
> non-RPM based distro. With all the distro's I've played with Centos 5
> and the current Ubuntu 9 (http://www.ubuntu.com/ ) are about the easiest
> to get up and running.
>
> Both of these distro's have a nice constant stream of free software
> updates/upgrades being feed into them so having an network connection
> available helps.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Dmitry
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:45 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] hardware requirements for Centos 2
>
> Hi.
>
> Could you please give me advice about issue described below.
>
> My friends have to use a PC with old hardware for a few months. They've
> got 128MB of RAM, 20 GB hard drive; Pentium 3 processor.
>
> At the moment they have windows xp running on it, but it's very slow.
>
> What are the system requirements for CentOS 2 or any other version of
> this OS that may be suitable?
>
> Can you recommend any other Linux distro that would be easy to install
> and to use?
>
> Thanks in advance for any input.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

I can smell a flame startin'
Under no circumstances should you install Ubuntu on that PC, it'll
work slower than a snail.
I used to have a similar PC (also with 128 ram), and the fastest
distros that run on it were Slackware and VectorLinux (without heavy
DE's like KDE or Xfce). Even so, 128 ram was painful, 256 was quite
almost enjoyable so I realy recommend to make an effort to buy some
more ram.