On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:59 PM, David Hrbáč<hrbac.conf at seznam.cz> wrote: > RedShift napsal(a): >> According to a commenter, this should provide a temporary countermeasure: >> >> iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j DROP -m u32 --u32 '30>>27&0xF=5' >> >> Haven't tested it, would like to know the results... >> > > Well, good point, but Centos does not ship libipt_u32.so. Even more > Centos 4.x is now undergoing rebuild process, so no updates even > security updates are being released. Which is something I can accept. > > Those looking for patched bind for Centos 4.x may use packages I have > built with CVE-2009-0696 patch. > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repoview/letter_b.group.html > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repoview/letter_b.group.html Well done, David but there's a little problem with those rpms: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] package bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed package bind-utils-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than bind-utils-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed package bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than bind-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed package bind-chroot-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than bind-chroot-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed Maybe you can bump the version a bit. > > Regards, > David Hrbáč > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >