[CentOS] release/update question
ra+centos at br-online.de
Wed Jun 3 09:17:35 UTC 2009
jim at rossberry.com wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> >> AFAIK, this never happened. Is the 5.x.z tree concept dead-before-birth?!
> > For CentOS: Yes.
> > For Upstream: Ask Red Hat.
> I have asked RHT repeatedly to walk me through the life of a package
> version. Nothing.
AFAIK the "z stream" does not come with your normal RHN subscription.
But I don't use RHEL, so I have no idea what it takes to get the .z
One of the reasons CentOS chose not to do it (other reasons are: No
SRPMS on public mirrors, too much mirror space would be neede).
On the other hand I am not really sure I understand your sentence.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the CentOS