[CentOS] release/update question

Kai Schaetzl maillists at conactive.com
Wed Jun 3 12:31:39 UTC 2009

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200:

> Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
> than CentOS 5.3

Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)


Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

More information about the CentOS mailing list