[CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

Ralph Angenendt ra+centos at br-online.de
Tue Jun 30 09:39:20 UTC 2009

Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
> not to be rude but back to the core of the original question: 
> is is safe to assume that future releases of Centos will remain a
> "built from publicly available open source SRPMS provided by a prominent North American Enterprise Linux vendor. CentOS conforms fully with the upstream
> vendors redistribution policies and aims to be 100% binary compatible.
> (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove upstream vendor branding and
> artwork).", AND all additional non-PNAELV packages will remain in the
> extra repository???

Eh, yes. That kind of is the whole point of it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090630/a153b09d/attachment.sig>

More information about the CentOS mailing list