[CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
John R. Dennison
jrd at gerdesas.comWed Jun 3 04:09:47 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- Next message: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:01:35PM -0700, Linux Advocate wrote: > > ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh .... godddddddddddddd..................... > > i have a quite a few linux boxes and not even one has been hacked..... oh man !!!!!! That you have noticed. > really??? i have to format the box..... Yes, it would be extremely irresponsible for you to allow that box to remain connected to the 'net. It's been compromised and as such it's a rogue server. John -- "I'm sorry but our engineers do not have phones." As stated by a Network Solutions Customer Service representative when asked to be put through to an engineer. "My other computer is your windows box." Ralf Hildebrandt <sxem> trying to play sturgeon while it's under attack is apparently not fun. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090602/73e3019d/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- Next message: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list