[CentOS] PAE or use 64-bit?
John Doe
jdmls at yahoo.comTue Jun 9 08:41:33 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] PAE or use 64-bit?
- Next message: [CentOS] PAE or use 64-bit?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden at gmail.com> > > > Which would you recommend for a 4GB+ machine? > > > A 32-bit install with PAE-enabled kernel or just use 64-bit? > > If you are not doing anything that needs a 64-bit address space, then > > 32-bit w/PAE will work just fine. > Yes, but I would recommend you to go with 64-bit OS anyways. > Even though PAE might work reasonably well if you have 4GB or 6GB or > 8GB and with your current applications, 64-bit will keep working well > when you need to upgrade your machine to 16GB or 32GB and run > additional applications or newer versions that need to address more > than 4GB per process. I also read somewhere that enabling PAE would take some of the memory away from some components (PCI? Bus?)... If you have 4GB, without PAE, you get 3.3GB. With PAE, you get 4GB. And it seemed to mean decreased performances. Anyone can confirm this? JD
- Previous message: [CentOS] PAE or use 64-bit?
- Next message: [CentOS] PAE or use 64-bit?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list