[CentOS] CentOS security advisories
Ralph Angenendt
ra+centos at br-online.deWed Jun 17 08:56:11 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joshua Bahnsen wrote: > That's really my question. Is there any particular reason why not all > Red Hat advisories (RHEA, RHBA and RHSA) have a CentOS counterpart? Is > this due to time constraints, demand, or some other legal reason? Ah. "Historical Reasons", probably. All RHSAs should be there, RHBAs just haven't been announced for 4 - there's no other appalling reason I could think of at the moment :) I'm not sure about RHEAs, though. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090617/0b312db2/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS security advisories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list