[CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
beranger5ca at yahoo.caTue Jun 30 14:59:17 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
- Next message: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Firefox was better than Mozilla. Nay. Only Firefox 0.9 was better than Mozilla. Later on, bloatware won. > It's definitely worth noting that, Epiphany & > Firefox popped up so quickly because they built on > Mozilla's rendering, etc. Yes, it's easier to add bloatware on a solid open-sourced base... > Things get pushed in the kernel, Xorg, etc. for a good > reason, even if we fail to see it. Hopefully, there is Someone up there who sees it. Then He will come for a second time to bring salvation to us. Hopefully, there is no HAL, no UDEV, no PulseAudio in either heaven or hell. > Well, you just said a few lines up that enough maintainers > are proven to keep up even 3x this size. Not to > mention the (PLD, I think) examples someone else brought > in the thread. I can't tell of PLD, as I have never used it. Next time someone will tell of Arch etc. etc. Not the right approach IMHO. Cheers, R-C __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
- Previous message: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
- Next message: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list