Vadtec wrote: > My apologies, I read his response incorrectly this morning. As for > GPG, more people need to use it, so you can expect that I will > continue to use my signature as it is. Thunderbird knows how to handle > GPG signatures, sorry your client doesn't. Then use PGP/Mime for signing mails so that the GPG stuff doesn't end up in the actual mail content. My mail client knows to handle those and yours does, too. And TRIM YOUR REPLIES, PEOPLE, while we're at it. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090613/9eb819f5/attachment-0004.sig>