----- Original Message ---- > From: Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <beranger5ca at yahoo.ca> > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:59:42 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag > > > > Where did you see the QA requirements for the packages > > in c.k.o ? > > I didn't. But since you say that there is a reason for > them to be in "testing", I then assumed the reason was > "testing". But then, the activity usually called "testing" > is part of a process usually called Quality Assurance. > > But hey, maybe I am way to stupid to match your geniality! > > > Also, why are you ignoring what has already > > been said to you about the repo and the target > > audience its aimed at ? > > *What* exactly has been said and by whom? > I only saw you inferring what it's *not* aimed at: > people who don't like things in "testing". > > As I said, and as everyone on this list knows: > KB is not a person to talk with. Usually, KB would > throw offensive assertion to people. No matter > what KB would say, and no matter how important is > KB to the CentOS project, a quick search through > the centos ML archives would show that KB is not > someone easy to deal with. > > Probably I should stop posting to this list. I only > mentioned KB's repo in the context of packages > staying in "testing" for years. > > R-C > I Can not speak for others, but the only time i have seen Karanbir be stern with anyone is when they do deserve it. I like the way he will point you to the right place without dancing around. I have no idea what your deal is though with going after anyone and everybody. Do you just love attacking people in gerernal? my 1/2 cent opinion! Steven