Scott Silva wrote:
> on 6-1-2009 9:43 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
>> If you have the epel repo installed and enabled during a yum update, you
>> get java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.el5.2 instead of the stock .b09
>> version. Is this intentional and desirable? I thought epel generally
>> did not replace stock components with newer versions.
>>
> Any third party repo has the potential to replace base files. That is why the
> priorities and the protectbase plugins were written.
Obviously they have the potential - and almost equally obviously an end
user will have no idea what to choose even if they do have a tiny bit of
control over yum (but no way to see where their existing version came
from). But I thought that long ago I asked if epel would supply a newer
Firefox or OpenOffice (back when it was needed and RHEL hadn't done it
yet...) and someone replied that it would not be epel policy to
overwrite stock packages. Was that not correct - or have things changed?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com