[CentOS] release/update question

Tue Jun 2 21:10:04 UTC 2009
Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com>

on 6-2-2009 1:53 PM Radu-Cristian FOTESCU spake the following:
> --- On Tue, 6/2/09, Dag Wieers <dag-IFYaIzF+flcdnm+yROfE0A at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
>> Communication problems are usually caused by both sides. 
> 
> Agreed. 
> 
>> Besides the EUS source RPM packages are not released
>> to the public, so you need those expensive entitlements
>> to be able to rebuild them. 
> 
> Eek. Never knew that. This looks more like SLES/SLED than like RHEL :-/
> 
>> So it seems a fair decision. 
> 
> I wasn't questioning CentOS's decision!
> 
>> So nothing is contradicting, you just have old
>> information and new information.
> 
> Thank you very much!
> 
> Now that things are clarified... why is audacious broken in RPMforge?
> "Missing Dependency: audacious-plugins >= 1.3.0 is needed by package audacious-1.3.2-5.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge)"
> 
Maybe this question is best asked on the rpmforge list, a separate entity from
CentOS.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090602/24fa82f7/attachment-0005.sig>