On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:33:21AM -0400, JohnS wrote:
> ---
> I'm no Bash expert but is there a real good reason "pass" would not be
> used in place of continue? I'm just really currious....
Because pass is not a valid bash language construct, at least in
3.2.25.
John
--
"I'm sorry but our engineers do not have phones."
As stated by a Network Solutions Customer Service representative when asked to
be put through to an engineer.
"My other computer is your windows box."
Ralf Hildebrandt
<sxem> trying to play sturgeon while it's under attack is apparently not fun.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090603/cc901cb2/attachment-0005.sig>