Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:17:35 +0200: > > > One of the reasons CentOS chose not to do it > > It appears that only a very very small number of people need it or *think* > they need it. Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice than CentOS 5.3, as it seems to be not really clear to people that this is not a "new version", but an update to the 5 series. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090603/51d9b07d/attachment-0005.sig>