On 21/06/09 13:28, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> That page does indeed reflect the current state of play - there is >> *no* centos approved or recommended commercial support entity - but >> it *is* something that is being worked on. > > i realize that page is *technically* correct, but its wording is > quite discouraging: If you want to propose a blob of text that might replace whats on the page right now, I am sure we can plumb that in. - KB